Statistics

Total images 31313

Recent comments

Return to advanced search

Comment by Aleks75 » Sun 14. May 2017, 07:15

ROS , that photo is just colorized reproductions of several black and white images combined in one photo, I think these photos you know.. With black-and-white photo it's hard to work and to achieve realism . But I still practice on it.
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by rosradley » Sun 14. May 2017, 02:21

I have no idea what you're talking about but I'm sure it's wrong.
By the way, your photoshop jobs are so fake looking. You should really make more of an effort toward realism. Remember, you don't have to push the colors and filters to the max to make the photo more interesting.
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by Aleks75 » Sat 13. May 2017, 15:36

YES ! Karma's a bitch is horrible ! Only Ros you made a mistake , here talking about the unsuccessful removal of watermark , and not using someone else's photo . I put on your photo watermark, that would be like it was before and didn't sell on eBay for profit . And you put on your photo watermark , what would YOUR pockets are not empty ...otherwise your book is just not interesting . Isn't it ? I have a photo of collection don't sell , and send to your friends absolutely free , and you're on your photo do business ... And not in Karma, here it is .. :lol: :lol:
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by rosradley » Fri 12. May 2017, 15:42

:lol:
What comes around goes around. Or, live by the sword and die by the sword. In other words, karma's a bitch.
Ain't that right, Aleks?
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by Aleks75 » Fri 12. May 2017, 06:36

The one that you (or someone else ) were removed from this photo created by me ! Image
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by Maty » Wed 10. May 2017, 18:26

What watermark? The image is clear and clean, where do you see the mark?
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by Aleks75 » Tue 9. May 2017, 09:23

How stupidly removed the watermark and greatly extended the .... Nightmare !
Comment on:
Dynasty
Dynasty

Uploaded by Maty
Mon 8. May 2017, 19:04

Comment by dethwiz » Mon 24. Apr 2017, 14:51

Paul is also wearing a modified version of Peter's Love Gun arm bands, and Eric's bodysuit could be Ace's Love Gun bodysuit, but I'm not sure.
Comment on:
KISS and Dennis Woloch
KISS and Dennis Woloch

Uploaded by ArcticFox
Wed 17. Aug 2016, 05:28

Comment by dethwiz » Thu 23. Mar 2017, 19:26

Possibly Savannah June 20 1979? The IWMFLY video shoot
Comment on:
mid79
mid79

Uploaded by zcmi!
Mon 24. Feb 2014, 22:44

Comment by dethwiz » Thu 23. Mar 2017, 19:21

Incredible photo!
Comment on:
Enjoy life!!
Enjoy life!!

Uploaded by zcmi!
Sat 4. Jul 2015, 13:27

Comment by rosradley » Thu 23. Mar 2017, 13:55

I don't know how this photo ever got labeled as Bismarck but it definitely is NOT from Bismarck.
It's from Portland, Maine, January 21, 1983. The photographer is a guy named Lucky Clark who has confirmed the date and location.
I do agree that the Bismarck show did not have the Love Gun outfits but just Gene wearing his Love Gun boots as stated above. However, there are still no confirmed photos from the Bismarck show to prove it.
Comment on:
Creatures
Creatures

Uploaded by ArcticFox
Sun 23. Jun 2013, 13:53

Comment by frwlbrng » Wed 22. Mar 2017, 20:34

This is from 1992.
Comment on:
Ace
Ace

Uploaded by ArcticFox
Thu 18. Feb 2016, 01:36
Next

cron