Creem Magazine Photo Session

Creem Magazine Photo Session
Creem Magazine Photo Session
Hollywood, California, October 19 1976
Photographer: Neal Preston
«« Blood Lust!
Blood Trance! »»
User avatar
RAJACKSON
NEWBIE
NEWBIE
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue 12. Oct 2010, 06:39

Creem Magazine Photo Session

Sun 22. Dec 2013, 04:15
526


zcmi!
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue 30. Apr 2013, 10:53

Post by zcmi! » Sun 22. Dec 2013, 19:39

why all the double takes
User avatar
RAJACKSON
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue 12. Oct 2010, 06:39
Contact:
RAJACKSON

Post by RAJACKSON » Sun 22. Dec 2013, 23:07

zcmi! wrote:why all the double takes


What double takes? Are you referring to the Ace Waring Abbott pic I posted, then you reposted a day later? Yeah, that must be it.

If I post something that has already been posted, which I rarely do, it means the post is better quality than what was posted before.
User avatar
Cheffe
Posts: 9120
Joined: Mon 31. May 2004, 11:59
Location: Wien
Contact:
Cheffe

Post by Cheffe » Sun 22. Dec 2013, 23:37

If you want me to delete an older pic, just let me know and link to it.
der admin & die moderatoren
- dafür stehen wir
- um euch überblick zu verschaffen
- um euch zu dienen
- infos zum board/boardregeln
- und ein offenes ohr haben wir auch, wenns vertraulich sein soll
[img]http://www.kissforum.de/phpbb3/images/KissNews3.gif[/img] [img]http://www.kissforum.de/phpbb3/images/Shop3.gif[/img]
User avatar
jestercommt
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri 11. Nov 2005, 19:13
Location: nürnberg
Contact:
jestercommt

Post by jestercommt » Sat 28. Dec 2013, 19:57

better two high quality "double takes" from somebody, who is really an enrichment for these archives nowadays, than hundreds of shitty, small, low resolution posts, which are not even rescueable with photoshop skills, cause they were not even scanned, but photographed from the originals and therefore often warped out of dimensions and angle...cropped with flashlight reflections and all that shit....!!!

man...you have problems!

when I see the posts nowadays, there is so much quality missing, cause most of the cool guys already went away from it...no wonder, when they get these kinda comments for their effords...!!!
User avatar
Swordandstone
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri 13. Oct 2006, 09:27

Post by Swordandstone » Sat 28. Dec 2013, 21:19

Word, Jester.
rosradley
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed 22. Dec 2004, 17:07
Location: Houston

Post by rosradley » Sat 28. Dec 2013, 22:28

I personally wish zcmi would be banned from this forum. His frequent verbal abuse should not be allowed. He has been banned from KISSFAQ for similar behavior.
User avatar
RAJACKSON
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue 12. Oct 2010, 06:39
Contact:
RAJACKSON

Post by RAJACKSON » Tue 31. Dec 2013, 21:07

rosradley wrote:I personally wish zcmi would be banned from this forum. His frequent verbal abuse should not be allowed. He has been banned from KISSFAQ for similar behavior.


I concur!
User avatar
RAJACKSON
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue 12. Oct 2010, 06:39
Contact:
RAJACKSON

Post by RAJACKSON » Tue 31. Dec 2013, 21:08

jestercommt wrote:better two high quality "double takes" from somebody, who is really an enrichment for these archives nowadays, than hundreds of shitty, small, low resolution posts, which are not even rescueable with photoshop skills, cause they were not even scanned, but photographed from the originals and therefore often warped out of dimensions and angle...cropped with flashlight reflections and all that shit....!!!

man...you have problems!

when I see the posts nowadays, there is so much quality missing, cause most of the cool guys already went away from it...no wonder, when they get these kinda comments for their effords...!!!


Well said jess!

Return to “Gene Simmons 1976”